This was the introductory sentence that one of my students wrote in his weekly writing journal. The story continues in a very political fashion, and much to my dismay it also continued on with much violence. My student is creative, caring and amazingly brilliant, but he has a certain fascination with politics, 911 and terrorism that certainly makes me widen my eyes in concern. After I noticed a pattern with his writing prompts, I decided to speak with him and advise him that he should be more careful when discussing politics in class. Some political items are beyond the other student’s realms… SHOOT… some of it is beyond my realm!! Not to mention is may cause discomfort in my diverse classroom. Some of my students are from war stricken countries. They have seen first-hand some of the violent acts that we only see on TV.
He quietly obliged and for the next couple of weeks I did not read about his love for politics in his writing. Then he came up to me and asked, “Mrs. Munoz? Are we not allowed to have freedom of speech? I would like to talk about politics but you told me not to!” I honestly didn’t know what to say. So I explained to him what I thought would be best. I stated that violence is hurtful and that even writing about it can be hurtful to others. I told him that I valued freedom of speech and that it was amazing that he had an interest for world affairs, but that I would really appreciate a little censorship in his writing and of course his online writing journal as well.
So here it comes to this week’s module. It was full of LOTS of information, as always. But what the heck do we expect? It’s a grad class. So lots of reading... lots of writing... Some days I dread it... but other days I am totally geeked out saving content to my Diigo. This week’s content was very relevant to the above anecdote. In Gayle Nicholls blog, she posed the below questions…
“As educators, should we help them understand what their role, rights and responsibility is in this space? Should we teach them censorship or have them challenge the right to public speech?
In these spaces should we also have a conversation about digital citizenship in the same way we discuss classroom citizenship in real classroom spaces? This is a growing part of our “new” education as online instructors. Their connection to what is right and wrong, what is “allowed” is still not clear to them. What is our responsibility?”
What is our responsibility?? Here is my answer and what I hope that my digital students will understand. Online citizenship should hold the same roles and responsibilities as real world citizenship. Gone are the times when the online world is one of fantasy and screen names and fiction. Yes you can still be CUPCAKEGIRL101 and send messages to HARRYPOTTERLVR, but we need to teach our students that what you do and what you say online is a real spectrum. I plan on teaching freedom of speech online but with the same rules of dignity and respect that I expect in my classroom. We need to respect each other’s differences first and foremost, so why would that be any different online? The difference between what is right and wrong may be subjective, but RESPECT is something that is unanimous.
Ref: http://gaylenicholls.edublogs.org/2011/09/11/i-cant-believe-you-said-that/